The Australian Declaration of Recognition introduces a new proposal for recognising Indigenous Australians. Sometimes we need to think about an old problem in a new way. In this essay, Damien Freeman and Julian Leeser argue that we should rethink our approach to Indigenous recognition: instead of trying to insert some modest statement in the Constitution, we should consider adopting an Australian Declaration of Recognition, which would contain a powerful and poetic statement of the nation that Australia has become, and our aspirations for our nation’s future.
In the United States, generations of Americans have drawn inspiration from the Declaration of Independence. So too, future generations of Australians will draw inspiration from the Australian Declaration of Recognition that we might adopt in 2017.
The need for recognition
In the next few years, Australians may decide to make substantive changes to the Constitution to address Indigenous issues. The purpose of some of these alterations is to change the cultural position of Indigenous Australians in the national story. We propose that, alongside any substantive constitutional changes, all historical and aspirational statements be embodied in an Australian Declaration of Recognition. An Australian Declaration of Recognition provides the best way to address cultural issues while avoiding legal technicalities.
- To download Freeman and Leeser’s pamphlet, The Australian Declaration of Recognition, click here
- To read Freeman’s speech, click here
Uphold & Recognise
Uphold & Recognise is an organisation of Australians who are committed both to upholding the Australian Constitution and recognising indigenous Australians. It was formed by Damien Freeman and Julian Leeser, and launched in April 2015, by Noel Pearson at two key events in Sydney, at the State Library of NSW and Hornsby RSL.
- To visit the Uphold and Recognise website, click here
Cultural change in coming generations
The Australian Declaration of Recognition’s greatest impact will be through the place it will hold in our national life, through its recitation at important ceremonial moments, including at the opening of parliament, civic ceremonies, citizenship ceremonies, and school assemblies. It is perhaps in this last arena that it will have its greatest impact. Coming generations of Australians will grow up reciting the Declaration on a regular basis: it will be committed to their memory; engraved on their hearts, and will form part of their make-up as Australians.
Left outside the Constitution, the Declaration can raise the nation’s spirits and, unlike amendments to the Constitution, its words are not limited by being the subject of lawyers’ arguments. Properly harnessed, the Declaration of Recognition could transform the way Indigenous Australians and other Australians relate to each other within a generation.
Discussion of the proposal
Professor Megan Davis, Director of the Indigenous Law Centre at the University of New South Wales, writes in the Indigenous Law Bulletin, “Damien Freeman and Julian Leeser … challenge the assumption that ‘recognition’ can only occur by way of inserting a statement in the Constitution… [their] approach is compelling… It would create a defining moment in a way that a Commonwealth referendum cannot.”
- To read Professor Davis’s article, click here.
The proposal was also the subject of a submission to the Australian Parliament’s Joint Select Committee on Constitutional Recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples.
- To read a report of the Select Committee, in which Freeman and Leeser’s proposal is discussed, click here.
The Crown, the Maori, and the Aborigines
In June of 2014, Freeman accompanied a delegation of Indigenous leaders on a trip to New Zealand, funded by the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet, to research Maori institutions and the Treaty of Waitangi, with a view to making recommendations about what Australia might learn from the New Zealand experience. Freeman was particularly impressed by the work of the Waitangi Tribunal and the process for achieving settlements between the Crown and the various Maori tribes. This informed an opinion piece that he wrote for The Australian.
- To read the opinion piece, in which Freeman discusses the significance of King George III’s 1787 instructions to Arthur Phillip for the future relationship between the Crown and the Aborigines, click here.
About Julian Leeser
Julian Leeser was educated at the University of New South Wales, where he graduated in arts and law. Upon graduation, he served as Associate to the Hon. Justice I. D. F. Callinan AC at the High Court of Australia, and then as an advisor to the present Prime Minister. After practising as a solicitor, at what was Mallesons, Stephen Jaques, he served as Special Advisor on constitutional law to the Commonwealth Attorney-General. He was a Visiting Fellow of the Taubman Center at the John F Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University 2006–2007. He served as Executive Director of the Menzies Research Centre from 2006–2012. He is presently Director, Government, Policy and Strategy at Australian Catholic University. He was the youngest elected delegate at the 1998 Constitutional Convention and a member of the No Case committee during the 1999 referendum campaign. Since 2009, he has been Conference Convener of the Samuel Griffith Society — a constitutional law and public policy discussion group. In 2013, he was National Convener of the Citizens’ No Case Committee for the Local Government referendum. His publications include Don’t Leave Us with the Bill: the case against an Australian bill of rights. He is involved in a number of community organisations, including the Executive Council of Australian Jewry and the Chinese Australian Forum.